If Canadians vote for this man after his statement about curtailing free speech…they deserve him. Canadian prime minister candidate Mark Carney has promised to restrict free speech if elected. Mark Carney, former Bank of Canada governor and current PM candidate, has pledged new restrictions on free speech if elected. Carney aims to address what he calls “pollution online,” including misogyny, antisemitism, and conspiracy theories allegedly coming from the United States.
Carney’s Controversial Campaign Promise
Former Bank of Canada governor Mark Carney has placed himself at the center of a heated national debate with his recent campaign promise to restrict free speech if elected prime minister. Speaking at a campaign event in Hamilton, Carney outlined his intention to implement new internet censorship laws, citing concerns about online content he claims is harmful to Canadian society.
Carney’s proposed restrictions represent a continuation of policies from Justin Trudeau’s administration, which has previously attempted to implement similar controls on online speech. This would mark the third effort by the Liberal party to enact such measures, raising concerns among free speech advocates about the potential long-term implications for Canadian democracy. The former central banker specifically targeted content originating from the United States as a primary concern, suggesting that harmful rhetoric crosses the border and negatively impacts Canadian society.
Liberal Canadian PM Mark Carney Runs on Banning Free Speech if Elected Canadian Prime Minister (Video)
READ: https://t.co/nQWvi03wnp pic.twitter.com/PNUV7NJ9Re
— The Gateway Pundit (@gatewaypundit) April 13, 2025
Targeting “Online Pollution” from the United States
In explaining his position, Carney specifically identified several categories of speech he intends to regulate: misogyny, antisemitism, hatred, and conspiracy theories. According to the PM candidate, these forms of expression constitute a form of “pollution” that flows into Canada across virtual borders from the United States. His concerns extend beyond mere offensive content to the potential real-world impacts on Canadian citizens, particularly in community spaces and educational institutions.
Beyond internet censorship, Carney has also criticized American policies on gun control and border security. He has suggested that these U.S. policies pose threats to Canadian safety, and in response, he plans to implement stricter gun regulations within Canada. This multi-pronged approach signals Carney’s broader intention to distance Canadian policy from American influence on several fronts, particularly regarding issues he identifies as potential security concerns.
Listen close. Copied.
The mask is off.
Mark Carney — the unelected WEF-backed Prime Minister — just vowed to push through NEW internet censorship laws.
This will be the THIRD attempt by the Liberal regime to crush dissent online.
They failed with Bill C-36.
They failed with… pic.twitter.com/pKUsQkRnpD— Slk55again (@slk55again) April 13, 2025
Mounting Criticism and Concerns
Carney’s announcement has faced significant backlash from critics who view the proposed restrictions as an assault on fundamental democratic principles. Opponents argue that government regulation of speech, even when positioned as protection against harmful content, risks undermining the very foundations of a free society. The debate reflects longstanding tensions between freedom and security that have characterized democratic discourse throughout history.
As the election approaches, Canadian voters find themselves at a crossroads, weighing competing values of individual liberty against collective security. The outcome will likely have profound implications for the future of free expression in Canada and could signal a broader shift in how Western democracies approach the regulation of speech in the digital age. For many conservative Canadians, this election represents a crucial moment for preserving traditional democratic freedoms against increasing government intervention.