Create airline transparency, but exercise caution—an appeals court recently upheld Biden’s flight fee disclosure rule. Procedural errors prevented the Biden administration’s 2024 airline fee rule from being implemented. The court confirms the DOT’s authority but orders additional study. Major airlines were legally opposed, citing the financial costs of compliance.
Legal Delays Hit Airline Fee Transparency
A key Biden administration rule requiring upfront airline fee disclosures, which was scheduled to go into effect in 2024, was halted by a US appeals court. The court discovered procedural errors by the U.S. Department of Transportation (USDOT), which hampered the rule’s immediate implementation. During the study review process, the Transportation Department failed to sufficiently engage the airlines. The ruling has returned the law for administrative correction, highlighting the delicate balance between regulatory goals and legal requirements.
This airline legislation was intended to protect consumers from hidden fees and unfair flight booking practices, despite the fact that airlines such as American, Delta, and United are staunchly opposed. A group of these airlines sought legal action, citing exorbitant costs and complex website updates. They argue that re-engineering their digital platforms to meet disclosure requirements would be prohibitively expensive.
Rule requiring full disclosure of airline junk fees blocked… for now. Could be reinstated after more lengthy process if Trump Administration doesn’t kill it. https://t.co/fLnpgt3MV0
— Brett Glass – WY7BG (@brettglass) January 29, 2025
DOT Given Green Light to Regulate yet Stymied by Process
The court upheld USDOT’s authority to create rules addressing unfair or deceptive airline behavior. It emphasized the importance of due process, allowing airlines to comment on a linked study supporting the rule. Concerns were raised about procedural errors in the use of post-comment period data. The holding requires the Transportation Department to take a more consultative approach when soliciting input from industry stakeholders.
“The court ruling said the department had authority to write fee disclosure rules that specifically address ‘unfair or deceptive practices being conducted by airlines.'” – court ruling
For the moment, the fee transparency rules are in limbo while USDOT addresses these points. Key stipulations aimed to bring fee disclosures to the forefront during booking, thwarting “bait-and-switch” tactics. However, with the legal back-and-forth persisting, the path to transparency for consumers remains mired in legal dispute, ensuring ongoing attention as the administration seeks to correct its procedure.
The Appeals Court ruled that while the DOT had the power to issue such rules, the rulemaking process had some procedural gaps. Read More Here! 👇 https://t.co/tIVDkh121c
— Simple Flying (@simple_flying) January 29, 2025
Future of Airline Fee Regulations Lies in Balance
Airlines for America, a primary litigant against the rule, articulated financial detriment concerns. The collective warned that such measures might “do more harm than good,” a sentiment shared by its members. With the judicial block in place and the appeals process ongoing, consumers are waiting for clarity on transparent pricing.
The Department of Transportation’s ambitions clash with the need for collaborative engagement with stakeholders. The resolution of these early procedural issues will have a significant impact on how these rules evolve. As the appeals court decision emphasizes, achieving transparency is dependent not only on what is proposed but also on how it is procedurally structured and received across all involved sectors.
Sources:
